Skip to content
Pre-product · Pre-revenue

Paid proof first.
Raise after.

Custody evidence for aviation baggage. Bootstrapped, in Munich, with no round open. We raise after the pilot proves willingness-to-pay.

Market

Cost pools, not a TAM slide

$6.3B· 2025

Direct mishandling cost

SITA Baggage IT Insights 2026

The cost pool our evidence shrinks.

< $1.9B· 2025

Baggage file handling, upper bound

Derived from SITA Baggage IT Insights 2026

$59 recovery initiation plus $20 admin processing is $79 per delayed bag. Across the 24M bags mishandled in 2025 that is under $1.9B. Reflight, last mile and storage are excluded: they are physical logistics, not file handling.

This is a ceiling, not an estimate. It applies the delayed-bag rate to every mishandled bag, and SITA does not publish the 2025 delayed share, so we do not assume one. The real pool is smaller.

Not every mishandled bag becomes a dispute. Sizing the disputed subset is what the first paid pilot exists to do.

These are cost pools we reduce, not revenue we book. The bottom-up model is validated by the first paid pilot, not by a TAM slide.

Traction

Discovery evidence, labelled as such

Field discovery

  • Operational research inside Lost & Found at GYD airport, scaled up to executive sessions.
  • Interline handoffs isolated as the liability black hole.
  • A hard “no new hardware” requirement, which is why the architecture is API-first.

Demand signals

  • 386 written survey responses and 27 in-depth interviews across 30+ countries.
  • 93% stated positive intent toward a verified recovery and evidence layer.
  • Live test: an unattended laptop at MBS was recovered within hours by a stranger via NFC/QR, with zero instructions.

Directional, not proof. Stated intent is not willingness to pay, and we treat this strictly as a directional signal. Methodology and limits are in the appendix below.

Early reach

  • 1,600+ Telegram subscribers before any product existed.
  • 500+ site visits from 30+ countries in six weeks.
  • 117 high-intent visitors, at $0 marketing spend.

Audience, not revenue. Nobody counted here has been asked to pay for anything.

Everything above is discovery evidence. The next milestone is a paid pilot, and we treat nothing as validated until someone pays.

Learning velocity

We audited our own thesis, and killed what failed

  • Consumer tracking wedge

    Cross-party evidence wedge

    Apple × WorldTracer closed consumer recovery.

  • Blockchain auto-payouts

    Evidence for existing claims workflows

    AXA shut Fizzy down in 2019.

  • Hardware-first rollout

    Zero-hardware API bridge

    Operators refuse overhauls. Our own field finding.

  • €1M pre-seed first

    Paid pilot first

    Capital-efficient until the market votes with money.

  • Top-down TAM theater

    Cost pools we shrink

    A bottom-up model, validated by the paid pilot.

A full strategic re-audit completed in under 60 days after our first accelerator pass. That iteration speed is what we bring.

Twelve-month plan

From thesis to paid proof

  1. Days 0–30

    Evidence MVP

    Ingest sample scan data into a verifiable custody timeline plus an exportable evidence pack.

  2. Days 30–120

    First paid pilot

    One design partner, ground handler first, with airline claims or an insurer as counterparty. Shadow pilot on real disputed bags.

    Target KPI: evidence assembly from weeks to under 48h.

  3. Months 4–9

    Corridor proof

    A carrier and insurer pair on one corridor. Two to three LOIs. A public case study.

  4. Months 9–12

    Seed round

    Sized to pilot outcomes, raised after the market votes, not before.

Proof comes from one paying partner, then scales.

Business model

Revenue follows the evidence

A paid design-partner pilot at €15–25K over 60–90 days, then a recurring custody fee per tracked bag plus an evidence-pack fee per claim, once pilot KPIs hold.

Pricing is a working hypothesis, and the pilot exists to test it. We deliberately dropped consumer hardware as the lead revenue line.

The full model, on the operator page
Appendix

Methodology and limits

  • 386 written survey responses and 27 in-depth interviews, 10 minutes each.
  • Respondents aged 16–60 across 30+ countries, mixed occupations and travel frequencies.
  • 93% stated positive intent toward a verified recovery and evidence layer.
  • Stated intent is not willingness to pay. We treat this strictly as a directional signal.
  • Payment validation comes from the design-partner pilot, not from surveys.

We publish the limits next to the numbers on purpose.

No round open.

Sevenoir is bootstrapped and is not raising today. The seed round is sized to pilot outcomes and comes after the market votes with money. If you want to be in the room when it does, the fastest way in is an introduction to an operator.